Close

G20 Foreign Ministers’ Meeting in New Delhi: Fissures over Ukraine affects the outcome

The G20 Foreign Ministers' Meeting in New Delhi failed to achieve any breakthrough results due to the West's anti-Russia rancour.

G20 Foreign Ministers' Meeting in New Delhi:

Photo credit: MEA, Government of India

India hosted the G20 Foreign Ministersโ€™ Meeting at New Delhiโ€™s Rashtrapati Bhawan from March 1st to March 2nd. Confrontations between the US-led western bloc and the Russian foreign ministry officials during this meeting exhibited how the shadow of Moscowโ€™s special military operations in Ukraine looms large on global affairs.

The emergence of bitter hostilities between the western bloc under the USโ€™s leadership and the Russian side showed the futility to expect any consensus on global issues, especially those related to economic development.

EAM discloses the problems in the G20 Foreign Ministersโ€™ Meeting

Indiaโ€™s External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar said, โ€œI would say, I donโ€™t want to put a percentage on it because thatโ€™s not a fair way of depicting โ€ฆa collection of issues, but do appreciate that on the bulk of the issues, which concern especially the global South, the developing countries, there was a considerable meeting of mindsโ€.

Jaishankar underscored the importance of moving ahead with other agendas of the G20 Foreign Ministersโ€™ Meeting and said, โ€œโ€ฆfor the Global South, the Russia-Ukraine conflict is a make-or-break issueโ€.

โ€œIf we had a perfect meeting of minds on all issues and captured it fully, then obviously, it would have been a collective statement, but there were issuesโ€ฆ I would say, very frankly, concerned the Ukraine conflict on which there were divergencesโ€ฆ there were differences on the Ukraine issue, which we could not reconcile between various parties who held differing positionsโ€, the external affairs minister said.

PM speaks of โ€œdeep global divisionsโ€

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi also urged the foreign ministers to engage with each other, despite their hostile views, in a meaningful way. โ€œYou are meeting at a time of deep global divisionsโ€, Modi said.

Modi also said, โ€œAs Foreign Ministers, it is but natural that your discussions are affected by the geo-political tensions of the day. We all have our positions and our perspectives on how these tensions should be resolved. However, as the leading economies of the world, we also have a responsibility towards those who are not in this room. The world looks upon the G20 to ease the challenges of growth, development, economic resilience, disaster resilience, financial stability, transnational crime, corruption, terrorism, and food and energy security. In all these areas, the G20 has capacity to build consensus and deliver concrete results. We should not allow issues that we cannot resolve together to come in the way of those we can.โ€

While, at the same time, Modi accused the West of pushing multilateralism to sheer crisis and causing devastation in developing countries. He said, โ€œWe must all acknowledge that multilateralism is in crisis todayโ€.

Indiaโ€™s position on multilateralism has made it a neutral entity in the Ukraine conflict, which has visibly irked the West. However, India has remained consistent with pursuing a relatively โ€˜independentโ€™ foreign policy.

โ€œMany developing countries are struggling with unsustainable debt while trying to ensure food and energy security for their people. They are also the ones most affected by global warming caused by richer countriesโ€, Modi accused.

He also claimed that Indiaโ€™s G20 presidency has โ€œtried to give a voice to the Global Southโ€. Modi also said that no single country or group can claim global leadership, ignoring the voice of the developing countries. โ€œNo group can claim global leadership without listening to those most affected by its decisionsโ€, Modi said, purportedly taking a dig at the West.

Russia vs the West at the G20 Foreign Ministersโ€™ Meeting

During the G20 Foreign Ministersโ€™ Meeting, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov accused the West of blaming Russia for everything going wrong in their countries. Lavrov alleged that the West is blaming Russiaโ€™s special military operation in Ukraine for inflation in their countries, while, at the same time, it didnโ€™t allow Russia to take steps to ease the global supply of food grains from Ukraine.

He alleged that the western delegates to the G20 Foreign Ministersโ€™ Meeting have turned the event into a โ€œfarceโ€, by turning it into an occasion to bash Russia for their failures in curbing inflation.

โ€œA number of Western delegations turned the work on the G20 agenda into a farce, wanting to shift the responsibility for their failures in the economy to the Russian Federation,โ€ Lavrov alleged.

Lavrov accused the West of โ€œshamelessly buryingโ€ the Black Sea grain export initiative that Moscow took in 2022 to ensure that Ukraine can export its agricultural produce through the southern ports. The grain export could have eased the pressure on Africa and other continents, while also easing the inflationary pressure caused on several geographies due to the supply-chain disruption caused by the Ukraine conflict.

โ€œThe West creates obstacles for the export of agricultural products of the Russian Federation, no matter how the representatives of the EU convince the contrary,โ€ Lavrov said.

Lavrov advocated for a reform of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC). He said, โ€œโ€ฆitโ€™s time to reform the UN Security Councilโ€. Lavrov further claimed, โ€œThis invasion (of Ukraine as per the West) reflects the reaction to the war the West was preparing for many years and that is why it was arming the Ukrainian regime.โ€

The US Foreign Secretary Anthony Blinken accused Russia of waging an โ€œunprovoked and unjustified warโ€ against Ukraine and asked it to immediately cease the special military operation.

Blinken alleged that Russiaโ€™s special military operation in Ukraine is the major cause of the economic inflation in the West while remaining mum on the sanctions on Russia imposed by US President Joe Bidenโ€™s administration.

โ€œWe must continue to call on Russia to end its war of aggression and withdraw from Ukraine for the sake of international peace and economic stability,โ€ Blinken said, drawing a sharp response from Lavrov.

The US allies like France, Germany and the Netherlands supported Blinken in the G20 Foreign Ministersโ€™ Meeting. They raised a chorus demanding an end to Russiaโ€™s special military operation in Ukraine.

French Foreign Minister Catherine Colonna, German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock, and Dutch Foreign Minister Wopke Hoekstra toed the US line in the G20 Foreign Ministersโ€™ Meeting and blamed Russia for global inflation. Hoekstra even advocated for prolonging the sanctions on Russia by the US-led western lobby.

The US and the West want Russia to resume the New START treaty

These foreign ministers also wanted Russia to resume the New START treaty โ€”a 2011 nuclear arms treaty with the US that Russian President Vladimir Putin decided to scrap latelyโ€”to ensure safety from a nuclear war. However, Russiaโ€™s Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov rejected any such proposal and claimed that the US may use the information regarding Russiaโ€™s nuclear arsenal to help Ukraine attack such facilities.

At a United Nations disarmament conference in Geneva, Ryabkov alleged that the US had attempted โ€œto probe the security of Russian strategic facilities declared under the New START Treaty by assisting the Kiev regime in conducting armed attacks against them.โ€

Moscowโ€™s withdrawal from the New START treaty has reportedly stirred panic in the West. But Moscow remains non-committal about resuming the dialogue. Outside the G20 Foreign Ministersโ€™ Meeting, Anatoly Antonov, the Russian Ambassador to the US, accused Washington DC of violating New START central provisions for years.

โ€œWashington has launched and dragged its European allies into a large-scale hybrid war against Russia. It openly declares its goal to inflict a strategic defeat on our country. And at the same time, as if nothing has happened, it insists on the inspection of our bases which store strategic nuclear weapons. It is the same bases that have been attacked by Ukraine with the help of the Pentagon. Where is the adherence to the spirit and letter of New START and its key goal of strengthening the security of Treaty parties? There is nothing but a brazen desire to โ€˜probeโ€™ the protection of our strategic facilities (sic),โ€ Antonov said in a statement released by the Russian embassy in the US.

The unimpressive outcome of the G20 Foreign Ministersโ€™ Meeting

Although the G20 is a group that consists of the seven richest countries of the world, including the US, it has several other members from the East and the โ€œGlobal Southโ€, who donโ€™t subscribe to the USโ€™s narratives. Australia, Brazil, China, India, Russia, Saudi Arabia, etc, are members of this prestigious group.

Jaishankar claimed that the G20 Foreign Ministersโ€™ Meeting had, โ€œthe presence of Foreign Ministers of 27 countries, apart from India, the chair, and two countries โ€“ the Republic of Korea and Japan were represented at the Vice Minister, the Minister of State level.โ€

The G20 Foreign Ministersโ€™ Meeting in New Delhi was also supposed to deal with broader issues like falling economic growth, increasing inflation, lower demands for goods and services as well as increasing prices of food, fuel, and fertilisers.

Although Jaishankar claimed that the G20 Foreign Ministersโ€™ Meeting was successful and there has been consensus on several issues โ€”like economic development, counter-narcotics, food and fertiliser supply chains, sustainable energy supply chains, global health architecture, pandemic funds, and tackling climate change through raising $100bn per yearโ€”the fact is it failed to add any remarkable achievements to the final document.

If the West continues the diplomatic rancour, which it did in the G20 Foreign Ministersโ€™ Meeting in New Delhi, at all international level meetings, then it will be causing more problems for the developing world. The Westโ€™s arbitrary actions will eventually polarise the world further and intensify new hostilities, rather than ending the existing ones. This can be a risk factor for global peace and security.


Join our channels on Telegram and WhatsApp to receive geopolitical updates, videos and more.

Tanmoy Ibrahim is a journalist who writes extensively on geopolitics and political economy. During his two-decade-long career, he has written extensively on the economic aspects behind the rise of the ultra-right forces and communalism in India. A life-long student of the dynamic praxis of geopolitics, he emphasises the need for a multipolar world with multilateral ties for a peaceful future for all.

Leave a comment
scroll to top