Close

Modi’s silence on Trump’s tariffs raises questions about Indian sovereignty

As the US president launches a global trade war, world leaders are quick to condemnโ€”except for a peculiar trio. The East Post examines how Modi's unusual acquiescence is trading India's economic interests for personal political capital.

When even close US allies are vocal in protest, Modi's silence on Trump's tariffs raises questions about India's economic sovereignty.

Donald Trumpโ€™s second administration has wasted little time in fulfilling his campaign promise to wage a trade war against the world. On what he bombastically dubbed โ€œLiberation Dayโ€โ€”April 2nd 2025โ€”the president announced steep tariffs affecting more than 180 countries, combining a 10% baseline tariff with additional โ€œreciprocalโ€ charges supposedly set at half the rate that other countries levy on American products. And Mr Trumpโ€™s tariffs shook the world, including India.

"I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, find that underlying conditions, including a lack of reciprocity in our bilateral trade relationships, disparate tariff rates and non-tariff barriers, and U.S. trading partnersโ€™ economic policies that suppress domestic wages and consumption, as indicated by large and persistent annual U.S. goods trade deficits, constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and economy of the United States.  That threat has its source in whole or substantial part outside the United States in the domestic economic policies of key trading partners and structural imbalances in the global trading system.  I hereby declare a national emergency with respect to this threat. (sic)" (Presidential Declaration)

For India, the result of Mr Trumpโ€™s tariffs was devastating: a 26% tariff on its exports to America, higher than those imposed on the European Union (20%), Japan (24%) and South Korea (25%), though not as punitive as the 54% slapped on China. The tariffs represent a significant setback for Indiaโ€™s trade relations with the United States and raise uncomfortable questions about Prime Minister Narendra Modiโ€˜s strategy of personal diplomacy with Mr Trump.

Strangely, while world leaders rushed to condemn Mr Trumpโ€™s tariffs and announce countermeasures, Mr Modiโ€™s government has maintained a conspicuous silenceโ€”an approach shared only by Israelโ€™s Benjamin Netanyahu and, to a lesser extent, Italyโ€™s Giorgia Meloni.

Market meltdown, sectoral shock follow Trumpโ€™s tariffs

The immediate reaction to Mr Trumpโ€™s tariffs announcement was predictably negative. In the first trading session after the news broke, the BSE Sensex dropped over 500 points, while the Nifty50 declined below 23,200 within 15 minutes. Gift Nifty fell by 1.5%, and the rupee weakened against the dollar, hovering around 85.69 amid the market volatility.

The impact across sectors has been uneven. The pharmaceutical industry, which contributes about $12.2bn to Indian exports to the US, has temporarily escaped tariffsโ€”a reprieve for companies like Syngene, Gland Pharma and Dr Reddyโ€™s, which derive 68%, 54% and 43% of their revenues from the American market respectively. The Nifty Pharma index increased by 2.73% after the announcement, reflecting this temporary relief.

โ€œExcept as otherwise provided in this order, all articles imported into the customs territory of the United States shall be, consistent with law, subject to an additional ad valorem rate of duty of 10 percent. (sic)โ€

Donald Trump

Less fortunate is the automotive industry, which contributes around 3% of Indiaโ€™s overall exports to the US. โ€œA blanket tariff of 26% is expected to impact demand and also the competitiveness of Indian automobile exports in the American market, which can have a cascading effect in terms of higher production costs, lay offs and supply chain challenges,โ€ Macquarie reported. The Nifty Auto index consequently dropped by 0.64%.

The information technology sector fared worse still, with the Nifty IT index tumbling by over 3% as fears of an American recession and cutbacks in discretionary spending loomed large. Analysts have downgraded the sector to equal-weight based on increasing US recession risks.

Other major export categories likely to be affected include machinery (15.6% of exports to America), gems and jewellery (11.5%), machinery for nuclear reactors (8.1%) and refined petroleum products (5.5%). Macquarie estimates that the combined effect could shave 50 basis points off Indiaโ€™s GDP growth.

Strange bedfellows: Netanyahu, Modi and silence

While most world leaders were quick to condemn Mr Trumpโ€™s tariffs and announce retaliatory measures, Mr Modi has maintained a conspicuous silenceโ€”even as his commerce minister, Piyush Goyal, returned empty-handed from Washington following the prime ministerโ€™s much-hyped February tour.

The Israeli prime minister, by contrast, moved quickly to exempt American imports from tariffs. โ€œToday we cancelled all of the customs duties levied on products from the US, Israelโ€™s largest trading partner,โ€ Mr Netanyahu wrote on X (formerly Twitter). โ€œIn addition to the advantages to the market and to citizens of Israel, the current effort will allow us to further strengthen the alliance and ties between Israel and the US.โ€

This eager compliance is perhaps less surprising given that Israel receives billions of dollars in American aid annually. India enjoys no such largesse, making Mr Modiโ€™s acquiescence all the more puzzling.

The contrast with other world leaders could hardly be starker. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced that the EU was โ€œalready finalising a first package of countermeasuresโ€ and โ€œpreparing for furtherโ€ action.

Chinaโ€™s Commerce Ministry โ€œfirmly opposesโ€ the tariffs and โ€œwill resolutely adopt countermeasuresโ€.

Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba questioned whether it โ€œmakes sense to apply uniform tariffs to all countriesโ€ and put โ€œall options on the tableโ€.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney vowed to โ€œprotect our workersโ€ with a 25% tariff on American vehicles.

Even Ms Meloni, a stalwart Trump ally, called the tariffs โ€œa wrong approachโ€ and pledged to โ€œdo everything we canโ€ฆ to prevent a trade war that would inevitably weaken the West.โ€

Asian alliance against Trumpโ€™s tariffs without India

Perhaps most tellingly, Indiaโ€™s absence was conspicuous at a recent economic dialogue between South Korea, China and Japanโ€”their first in five years. The three export powerhouses met on March 30th, just days before Trumpโ€™s announcement, to โ€œclosely cooperate for a comprehensive and high-levelโ€ free trade agreement to promote โ€œregional and global tradeโ€.

This Asian alliance, formed specifically to counter American protectionism, might once have seemed a natural fit for India. Yet Mr Modi appears more interested in placating Mr Trump than in joining forces with regional partners.

During his February visit to Washington, the Indian prime minister went so far as to plagiarise Mr Trumpโ€™s โ€œMake America Great Againโ€ slogan, proposing a โ€œMake India Great Againโ€ initiative while promising greater Indian purchases of American goods and services, as well as more Indian investments to create jobs in the United Statesโ€”peculiar priorities given Indiaโ€™s high unemployment rate.

Path not taken

As Mr Trumpโ€™s tariffs begin to bite, Indiaโ€™s options for response appear limited by Mr Modiโ€™s reluctance to challenge his American counterpart. While the impact might not be catastrophicโ€”Indiaโ€™s exports in the most vulnerable sectors amount to only 1.1% of its GDPโ€”the tariffs will certainly hit high-export sectors, reduce Indiaโ€™s foreign exchange earnings and potentially create problems for its balance of payments, especially for oil imports.

This vulnerability is exacerbated by Mr Modiโ€™s refusal to support the BRICS nationsโ€™ push for trading in local currencies, which would be a significant step towards de-dollarisation. His reluctance forces Indian businesses to pay a heavy price amid high economic stagnation.

Unlike Mr Netanyahu, whose strategic embrace of Mr Trump brings tangible benefits in the form of American aid and diplomatic cover, Mr Modiโ€™s silence appears to secure nothing but the most ephemeral of rewards: photo opportunities and fleeting praise from a notoriously fickle American president.

As global leaders from London to Beijing formulate their responses to Trumpโ€™s trade war, the Indian prime ministerโ€™s unusual acquiescence raises uncomfortable questions about the price of his personal diplomacyโ€”and whether Indiaโ€™s economic sovereignty is being traded away for a pat on the back.

In the court of global public opinion, Mr Modi now finds himself in the peculiar company of Mr Netanyahuโ€”celebrating Mr Trumpโ€™s tariffs while everyone else condemns them. The difference, of course, is that, unlike Mr Netanyahu, Mr Modi receives no American largesse to offset the economic pain. Mr Modiโ€™s silence on Mr Trumpโ€™s tariffs speaks volumes about his priorities, as Indiaโ€™s businesses and consumers prepare to pay the price.


Join our channels on Telegram and WhatsApp to receive geopolitical updates, videos and more.

Tanmoy Ibrahim is a journalist who writes extensively on geopolitics and political economy. During his two-decade-long career, he has written extensively on the economic aspects behind the rise of the ultra-right forces and communalism in India. A life-long student of the dynamic praxis of geopolitics, he emphasises the need for a multipolar world with multilateral ties for a peaceful future for all.

Leave a comment
scroll to top